<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surveillance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bifsniff.com/film-tv/surveillance/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bifsniff.com/film-tv/surveillance</link>
	<description>Arts &#038; culture blog based in Cork Ireland</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eoin</title>
		<link>http://bifsniff.com/film-tv/surveillance#comment-66688</link>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 22:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bifsniff.com/film-tv/surveillance#comment-66688</guid>
		<description>Mulholland Drive was worth it for Naomi Watts alone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mulholland Drive was worth it for Naomi Watts alone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://bifsniff.com/film-tv/surveillance#comment-66612</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bifsniff.com/film-tv/surveillance#comment-66612</guid>
		<description>I don't know, it looks gratuitously disturbing to me.  I saw that Mulholland Drive in the cinema when it was doing the rounds and felt like asking for my money back when it was over-rubbish.  Shock for shock's sake is just so passee Mr. Lynch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, it looks gratuitously disturbing to me.  I saw that Mulholland Drive in the cinema when it was doing the rounds and felt like asking for my money back when it was over-rubbish.  Shock for shock&#8217;s sake is just so passee Mr. Lynch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eoin</title>
		<link>http://bifsniff.com/film-tv/surveillance#comment-66000</link>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bifsniff.com/film-tv/surveillance#comment-66000</guid>
		<description>I think if they stopped the trailer after 37 seconds it would have been a good one.  Throw up David Lynch's name then and that should have your audience hooked.

Really like the sound carrying over the WB logo though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if they stopped the trailer after 37 seconds it would have been a good one.  Throw up David Lynch&#8217;s name then and that should have your audience hooked.</p>
<p>Really like the sound carrying over the WB logo though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://bifsniff.com/film-tv/surveillance#comment-65989</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bifsniff.com/film-tv/surveillance#comment-65989</guid>
		<description>Ooooh... nice. 

May give too much away in the trailer alright, but it looks like a great mix of styles - early David Lynch meets the best nineties horror/slasher flicks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooooh&#8230; nice. </p>
<p>May give too much away in the trailer alright, but it looks like a great mix of styles - early David Lynch meets the best nineties horror/slasher flicks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
